In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Santram C. Sheth, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus SANTRAM C.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 168 of 1998
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus
SANTRAM C. SHETH
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
MR RA MISHRA for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 12/10/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
�Heard both the sides. From the material placed
before us and the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, it appears that the following question suggested by the Revenue does arise for consideration of
this court.
"Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in confirming the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (appeal) directing the Assessing Officer not to treat the alleged
service charges as additional rent but to being the same to tax under the head "income from other sources?". The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is, therefore, directed to furnish the statement of case in respect of the said question under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs.� ��******
syed*
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.