Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Saurshtra...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Saurshtra Co-Operative Spinning Mills Ltd

High Court 01 Sep 1999 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Saurshtra Co-Operative Spinning Mills Ltd
Date of order
01 Sep 1999
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Saurshtra Co-Operative Spinning Mills Ltd, the High Court (1999) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Reference is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 388 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus SAURSHTRA CO-OPERATIVE SPINNING MILLS LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MR BB NAIK WITH MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner MR DA MEHTA & MR RK PATEL FOR MR KC PATEL for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE Date of decision: 01/09/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT (PER C.K.THAKKAR, J) 1.�The following question is referred for the opinion of this Court :- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in coming to the conclusion that the assessee was entitled to the allowance in respect of guest house expenses claimed by the assessee u/s. 37(4) of the I.T. Act, 1961?" 2.�The point is covered by a decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ahmedabad Manufacturing and Calico Printing Company Ltd., 197 ITR 538. It was also followed by a Division Bench in Income Tax Reference No.284 of 1983, decided on 10th October, 1996. 3.�In view of the fact that the point is concluded, the question, the question referred to us must be answered in the affirmative, i.e. in favour of the assess and against the revenue. Reference is accordingly disposed of. In the facts and circumstances, no order as to costs. ����[ C.K. THAKKAR, J. ] ����[ A.L. DAVE, J. ] gt
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan