Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Prabh...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Prabhu Dayal Kanojia

High Court 20 Apr 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Prabhu Dayal Kanojia
Date of order
20 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Prabhu Dayal Kanojia, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of above, this appeal is dismissed in the light ofcircular dated 10[th] December, 2015.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANAT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.432/2009 Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Shri Prabhu Dayal Kanojia DATE OF ORDER : 20/04/2016HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS Mr. R.B. Mathur, for appellant None present for non-appellant The appeal is listed on application, however, we find that total tax liability involved in the present appeal is less thanRs.20 lacs rather it is less than Rs.5 lacs. The circular dated 10[th]December, 2015 applies to the present appeal and accordinglyrevenue is not to press the appeal. The aforesaid fact has notbeen denied by the learned counsel for appellant. In view of above, this appeal is dismissed in the light ofcircular dated 10[th] December, 2015. The Revenue wouldhowever be at liberty to seek revival of the appeal if it is sodesired in conformity with the circular dated 10[th] December, 2015. ,J. [M.N. BHANDARI], J. FRBOHRA Certificate: “All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/orderbeing emailed.” Fateh Raj Bohra, Private Secretary
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan