Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Standard Batteries Ltd
High Court
25 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Standard Batteries Ltd
Date of order
25 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Standard Batteries Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal is liable to be dismissed for want of substantial question of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1792 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Standard Batteries Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mrs.Padma Divakar for appellant.
Mr.Nishant Thakker i/b. MINT & Conferers for respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 25TH AUGUST, 2009
DATE :
Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal.Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2.It is brought to our notice by the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent that the appeal bearing ITXA(L) No.2392 of 2007 involving identical issue for the A.Y.2001-02 having tax effect of Rs.53,62,000/- has been withdrawn by the Revenue. The learned Counsel for the Respondent, has raised the very same issues, which were the subject matter of the appeal withdrawn by the Revenue. In this view of the matter, appeal is liable to be dismissed for want of substantial question of law. Order accordingly. No order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue