Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Standard Batteries Ltd
High Court
25 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Standard Batteries Ltd
Date of order
25 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Standard Batteries Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1793 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax
Vs.
Standard Batteries Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mrs.Padma Divakar for appellant.
Mr.Nishant Thakker i/b. MINT & Conferers for respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 25TH AUGUST, 2009
DATE :
Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal.Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2.Both the authorities below have considered the issue and recorded a concurrent finding of fact that it was a case of change of opinion. The Tribunal has specifically dealt with the aspect of the matter in paragraph No.4, which reads as under:
4.4.It has already been held that, in the instant case, reopening has ben done merely on the basis of change of opinion. Following various decisions cited above, it is held that the reopening of the assessment u/s.147 of the I.T.Act was not valid. Accordingly, the assessment completed u/s.143(3) consequent to the issue of notice u/s.147 is held to be null and void.
3.In view of the aforesaid finding, it can hardly be said that the appeal involves any substantial question of law. Appeal is devoid of merit. Hence, the same stands dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.