Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Stellaben
High Court
09 Dec 2004 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Stellaben
Date of order
09 Dec 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Stellaben, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus STELLABEN D/O.JIVANLAL KINARIWALA ------------------------------------------------------------...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX APPLICATION No.219 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA�Sd/-
and
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI �Sd/-
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?
-------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus
STELLABEN D/O.JIVANLAL KINARIWALA
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX APPLICATION No. 219 of 1999
MR MANISH R BHATT for Applicant No. 1 MRS SWATI SOPARKAR for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
and
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI
Date of decision: 09/12/2004
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)
1.�Heard Mr.M.R.Bhatt, learned Senior Standing
Counsel for the applicant - revenue and Mr.S.N.Soparkar,
learned Senior Advocate for the respondent - assessee.
In light of the order dated 22-03-2004 made in Review
Petition Nos.1682-1737 of 2003 and Civil Appeal
Nos.6148-6157 of 1998 and cognate matters by the Apex
Court, the following questions of law arise out of the
order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
�"1. "Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right
in law and on facts in confirming the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal) directing to exclude
the income of 4 BOIs from the income of
the assessee ?"
�2. "Whether, the Appellate Tribunal ought
not to have appreciated that the ratio of
the decision in the case of Mc.Dowell &
Company was Applicable in the instant
case ?
2.�Accordingly, the Tribunal is directed to draw up
the statement of case and raise and refer the questions
of law for the opinion of this Court. Rule made
absolute.
����Sd/-��Sd/-
���[ D.A.MEHTA,J ] [ H.N.DEVANI,J ]
* * *
'Bhavesh'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.