Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sudarshan
High Court
27 Jun 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sudarshan
Date of order
27 Jun 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sudarshan, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: The learned counsel for the Appellant tendered a draft amendment to incorporate questions of law which read as under: i."Whether in the facts and in the circumstances and in the law the tribunal is right in hold that the amount collected by way Excise Duty, Sales Tax Refund cannot be included in the...
Decision: The Appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5 OF 1999
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5 OF 1999
The Commissioner of Income tax-I
Pune ...Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Baker Mercer (I)Pvt.Ltd. ...Respondents.
Mr.A.S.Rao for the Appellant.
Mr.P.D.Damodar i/b M/s.Kanga & Co. for the
Respondent.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 27th June, 2005.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.H.BHATIA, JJ.
DATE : 27th June, 2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the
Appellant and the learned counsel for the
Respondents. The learned counsel for the
Appellant tendered a draft amendment to
incorporate questions of law which read as
under:
i."Whether in the facts and in the
circumstances and in the law the tribunal is
right in hold that the amount collected by way
Excise Duty, Sales Tax Refund cannot be
included in the turnover for the purposes of
deduction U/s 80 H H C".
: 2 :
2. Amendment allowed. Amendment to be
carried out within a week from today. The
learned counsel for the Appellant (Revenue)
also states that the Tribunal has taken a view
that the amount collected by way of Excise
Duty, Sales Tax Refund can not be included in
the turnover for the purpose of deduction
under section 80(H)(H)(C)(1) of the Income Tax
Act, 1961. The learned counsel for the
Appellant also pointed out that the Division
Bench of our High Court in the case of
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sudarshan
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sudarshan
Chemicals Industries Ltd. and Others,Bombay,
Chemicals Industries Ltd. and Others,Bombay,
245 ITR 769
245 ITR 769 has also taken the view that the
245 ITR 769
Excise Duty and Sales Tax refund can not be
included the total turnover for the purpose of
computing special deduction under section
80(H)(H)(C)(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
In the light of the aforesaid judgment of our
High Court, we answer above question in the
affirmative and in favour of the assessee and
against the Revenue.
: 3 :
3. The Appeal is accordingly dismissed.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.