Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Surajben C...

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Surajben C Patel Trust

High Court 06 Nov 2000 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Surajben C Patel Trust
Date of order
06 Nov 2000
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Surajben C Patel Trust, the High Court (2000) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 263 of 1985 and INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 296 of 1985 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus SURAJBEN C PATEL TRUST -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI and MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH Date of decision: 06/11/2000 COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI) �Similar question referred to in the case of the same assessee has been answered in its favour by this Court in Income Tax Reference No. 224 of 1985 decided on 23.11.1989. That reference was answered relying on the decision of this Court in the case of K.T. Doctor vs. CIT, 124 ITR 501. �In view of the aforesaid, we do not consider it necessary to go into the facts involved in these references in detail and we answer the questions referred to in these references for the assessment years 1980-81 & 1981-82 and 1978-79 respectively in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. �The references are accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs. ����(D.M. Dharmadhikari, CJ) ����(M.S. Shah, J.) sundar/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan