Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Surat Dist. Co.op.milk Producers Union Ltd
High Court
15 Apr 1998 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Surat Dist. Co.op.milk Producers Union Ltd
Date of order
15 Apr 1998
Assessment year(s)
1980-81, 1978-79
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Surat Dist. Co.op.milk Producers Union Ltd, the High Court (1998) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus SURAT DIST.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 26 of 1987
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Versus
SURAT DIST. CO.OP.MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD.
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR RP BHATT for Petitioner
Mr.B.D.Karia and Mr.R.K.Patel for the Respondent
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
Date of decision: 15/04/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
��(Per R.K.Abichandani,J)
��The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has
referred the following question for the opinion of this Court under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances
of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in
holding that the assessee was eligible to relief
under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act on interest of
Rs. 1,39,069/- received by the assessee from the
co-operative societies without taking into
account that a sum of Rs. 6,72,155/- was paid by
the assessee as interest to other co-operative
societies ?"
2.��The matter relates to the assessment year
1980-81. The assessee is a co-operative society which had received interest amount of Rs. 1,39,069/- from other co-operative societies and had paid a sum of Rs. 6,72,135/- as interest to other co-operative societies. The I.T.O. rejected the claim of the assessee for exemption under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect
of the interest received by it from other co-operative societies. On appeal, C.I.T.(Appeals) directed the I.T.O. to allow deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The Tribunal following its decision in assessee's own case, for the assessment year 1978-79, dismissed the
Revenue's appeal.
3.��From the decision of the Tribunal in
assessee's own case for the assessment year 1978-79, and dealing with an identical question, this Court following its decision in C.I.T. vs. Surat District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd., reported in 211 ITR, 726 left the question unanswered for the reasons given in its decision dated 30.1.98 with a direction to the Tribunal to decide the question on merits after considering the relevant facts and by applying the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in its decision in Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co.Ltd. vs. C.I.T. reported in 113 ITR, 84. Following the said decision, the question referred to this Court is left unanswered leaving it open to decide the question on merits after considering the relevant facts in light of the ratio of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. reported in 113 ITR, 84 and earlier decision of this Court in assessee's own case. The Reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as
to costs.
���...
***darji
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.