Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Udayana Bose
High Court
17 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Udayana Bose
Date of order
17 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Udayana Bose, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to cost.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.818 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Udayana Bose
..Appellant
..Respondent
Ms. Anuradha Mane for appellant.
Mr.P.J.Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate with Mr.B.D.Damodar i/b.Kanga & Co. for respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 17[th] June,2009
DATE :
Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
The question sought to be raised in the present appeal has been considered by the Tribunal in paragraph Nos.29 to 33 of its order. Having gone through the same, it is clear that the Tribunal has recorded finding of fact after appreciating the evidence available on record. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to cost.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue