Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. V W Chemburkar
High Court
03 Dec 1996 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. V W Chemburkar
Date of order
03 Dec 1996
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. V W Chemburkar, the High Court (1996) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus V W CHEMBURKAR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BHARAT J.
Decision: The reference stands disposed of with no order as to costs. ***
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 315 of 1983
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA.
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus V W CHEMBURKAR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR BHARAT J. SHELAT INSTRUCTED BY MR MANISH R BHATT for applicant SERVED for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA.
Date of decision: 03/12/96
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per R.K.Abichandani, J)
1.�The following two questions have been referred to
the Court for its opinion under Section 256(1) of the
Income Tax Act:
1. "Whether, on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the Tribunal
was right in law in coming to the
conclusion that, the assessee did not
derive any perquisite as a result of
using of the car for personal purpose and
therefore the value thereof could not be
added to the income of the assessee?"
2. "Whether, on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the Tribunal
was right in law in coming to the
conclusion that, the assessee was
entitled to the full standard deduction
under Section 16(1) of the Income Tax
Act, 1961?"
2.�The questions are directly covered by the
decision of this Court in Income Tax Reference No. 266
of 1982 decided on 9.11.1995 in which my Esteemed Brother
speaking for the Bench put the proposition very tersely
that no personal benefit was offered to the assessee by
providing the car when for its personal use recovery of
expenses was made from the assessee. In this view of the
matter, both the questions are answered in the
affirmative and against the revenue. The reference
stands disposed of with no order as to costs.
***
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.