Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ved Bhasin
High Court
18 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jammuhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ved Bhasin
Date of order
18 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ved Bhasin, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
ITA No.2/2013
Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. K. M. Bali, Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, J&K, Jammu Mr. M. B. Raizada, ITO Hq (Adm) for Pr. C.I.T, J&K, Jammu
v/s
Ved Bhasin ... Respondent(s)
Coram :
Through:- None.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGEHON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER
Mr. K. M. Bali, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, J&K,
Jammu and Mr. M.B.Raizada, Income Tax Officer, Hq (Adm), Jammu present in Court have submitted that the decision has been taken by the department to withdraw the present appeal in view of the Circular No. 17 of 2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on August 08, 2019.
The prayer made by the appellant is accepted. The present appeal is permitted to be withdrawn. However, leaving the questions of law open.
Jammu 18.09.2019 Vijay
(Sindhu Sharma) (Rajesh Bindal) Judge Judge
Whether the order is speaking? : No Whether the order is reportable? : Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue