Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Voltamp Tr...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Voltamp Transformers Pvt Ltd

High Court 03 Jul 2002 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Voltamp Transformers Pvt Ltd
Date of order
03 Jul 2002
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Voltamp Transformers Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2002) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus VOLTAMP TRANSFORMERS PVT LTD. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 96 of 1990 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus VOLTAMP TRANSFORMERS PVT LTD. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 96 of 1990 MRS MAUNA R BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ Date of decision: 03/07/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �In this reference at the instance of the revenue, the following question is referred for our opinion in "Whether, the appellate tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that the receipt on account of C.C.S. amounting to Rs.7,64,007/- is a capital receipt and hence not exigible to tax ?" 2.�Heard Mrs Mauna Bhatt, learned standing counsel for the applicant-revenue. Though served, none appears for the respondent-assessee. 3.�The learned counsel for the revenue has invited out attention to the provisions of Section 28(iiib) of the Income-tax Act,1961 and submitted that in view of the aforesaid clause inserted by the Finance Act, 1990 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1967, the amount of Cash Compensatory Support received by the assessee was a revenue receipt and, therefore, liable to be taxed. 4.�Clause (iiib) of Section 28 inserted with retrospective effect from 1.4.1967 reads as under :- "28.�The following income shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession" - �(iiib) cash assistance (by whatever name called) received or receivable by any person against exports under any scheme of the Government of India." �In view of the aforesaid legislative amendment with retrospective effect, there can be no scope for any controversy and it has to be held that the Cash Compensatory Support received by the assessee was a revenue receipt. 5.�In view of the above discussion, our answer to the question is in the negative i.e. in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. 6.�The reference accordingly stands disposed of with no order as to costs. ���(M.S. Shah, J.)�(K.A. Puj, J.) sundar/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan