Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ward I, Virudhunagar v. S.harikrishnan
High Court
29 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ward I, Virudhunagar v. S.harikrishnan
Date of order
29 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ward I, Virudhunagar v. S.harikrishnan, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learnedhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.1.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENANDTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Tax Case Appeal No.1028 of 2015
Commissioner of Income Tax,Ward I,Virudhunagar.
.. AppellantVersus
S.Harikrishnan.. Respondent
Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court against the order ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `A' Bench, Chennai,dated 17.04.2015, in I.T.A.No.3075/MDS/2014 against the order ofthe Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals) II, Madurai dated27.08.2014 and made in ITA No.352/2011-12 against the assessmentorder of the Income Tax Officer (ward I(1),Virudhunagar, dated23.12.2011 for the year 2009-10 made in PAN/GIR No. .
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Mr.M.SwaminathanO R D E R
The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue hadsubmitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdrawthe present tax case appeal, in view of the Circular No.21 of2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department ofRevenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is lessthan Rs.20,00,000/-.
2. The learned counsels had further submitted that libertymay be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax caseappeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn,inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptionsmentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.
3. In view of the said submissions made by the learnedhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clearthat the questions of law, which may arise for the decision ofthis Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to beconsidered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance withlaw. It is also made clear that it would be open to theAppellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is foundthat it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it fallsunder the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular,within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrargv/sskTo:1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `A' Bench, Chennai.2. The Assistant Regi,Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,IV Floor Rajgi Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai.3. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II,Madurai.4. The Income Tax Officer,Ward I(1), Virudhunagar.
+1 cc to Mr.M.Swaminathan, Advocate, sr.6375
Tax Case Appeal No.1028 of 2015ksj cokra 16.02.2016
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.