Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle Iichennai 600 034 v. M/S.handloom Heritage Limitedno
High Court
02 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle Iichennai 600 034 v. M/S.handloom Heritage Limitedno
Date of order
02 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
2000-2001
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle Iichennai 600 034 v. M/S.handloom Heritage Limitedno, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the said submission, these Tax Case Appeals are dismissed for low tax effect, keeping open the substantial questions of law for adjudication at appropriate stage.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Tax Case Appeal Nos.379, 382, 385 & 388 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.09.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR
AND THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
Tax Case Appeal Nos.379, 382, 385 and 388 of 2015
ANDM.P.Nos.1, 1, 1 and 1 of 2015
Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle IIChennai 600 034
Vs.
.. Appellant in all TCAs
M/s.Handloom Heritage LimitedNo.37, Rajamannar StreetT.Nagar, Chennai 600 017PAN : AAACH0890A
.. Respondent in all TCAs
Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the common order dated 18.05.2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,'B' Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.Nos.1762/Mds/2010, 1765/Mds/2010, 1793/Mds/2010 and 1796/Mds/2010 for the AY 2000-2001, 2003-2004, 2000-2001, 2003-2004, respectively.
For Appellant : Mr.Karthik Ranganathanin all TCAs Senior Standing CounselFor Respondent: Mr.K.Ravi
in all TCAs
C O M M O N J U D G M E N T
(Delivered by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.)
It is brought to our notice by the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant/Revenue that in the instant cases, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeals filed by the Revenue can be disposed of, keeping the substantial questions of law raised in these appeals open for adjudication at a later point of time,
2. Recording the said submission, these Tax Case Appeals are dismissed for low tax effect, keeping open the substantial questions of law for adjudication at appropriate stage. No costs.
[R.S.K.,J.] [C.S.N., J.] 02.09.2024
gyaInternet : YesIndex : Yes / No
Tax Case Appeal Nos.379, 382, 385 & 388 of 2015
R. SURESH KUMAR, J.AND C. SARAVANAN, J.gya
Tax Case Appeal Nos.379, 382, 385 & 388 of 2015
02.09.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.