Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle...

Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle,Chennai v. M/S. D.k.nagu Sah & Brothers

High Court 24 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle,Chennai v. M/S. D.k.nagu Sah & Brothers
Date of order
24 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle,Chennai v. M/S. D.k.nagu Sah & Brothers, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

T.C.A.No.868 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.10.2024 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTHandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN T.C.A.No.868 of 2013 Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle,Chennai...Appellant vs M/s. D.K.Nagu Sah & Brothers,82, Gandhi Road,Kancheepuram,PAN .. Respondent Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai dated 30.09.2011 in IT (SS) A.No.21/MDS/2011. For Appellant :Mr.T.Ravikumar Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent:Mr.N.V.Balaji T.C.A.No.868 of 2013 DR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN.,J. JUDGMENT (Delivered Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J) Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the Income-Tax Department does not wish to pursue this appeal and seeks withdrawal of the same on account of low tax effect per Circular bearing No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024. Hence T.C.A.No.868 of 2013 is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Index:Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nossm [A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 24.10.2024 T.C.A.No.868 of 2013
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan