Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Ko...

Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Kolkata v. M/S. Hooghly Mills Companylimited

High Court 09 Feb 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Kolkata v. M/S. Hooghly Mills Companylimited
Date of order
09 Feb 2023
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Kolkata v. M/S. Hooghly Mills Companylimited, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Issue: The revenue has raised the following substantialquestion of law for consideration: (i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstancesof the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunalwas justified in directing the disallowance onaccount of gratuity payable to employeesamounting to Rs.1,68,90,760/- ?

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ITA/189/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL-I, KOLKATA -Versus- M/S. HOOGHLY MILLS COMPANYLIMITED BEFORE :THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAMAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYADate : 9[th ]February, 2023 Appearance :Mr. Soumen Bhattacharyya, Adv.…for the appellant. Mr. Asim Chowdhury, Adv.Mr. Soham Sen, Adv.…for the respondent. The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue underSection 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ forbrevity) is directed against the order dated 6[th] March, 2009passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” Bench, Kolkata(the Tribunal) in ITA No.2139/Kol/2008 for the assessment year2005-06. The revenue has raised the following substantialquestion of law for consideration: (i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstancesof the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunalwas justified in directing the disallowance onaccount of gratuity payable to employeesamounting to Rs.1,68,90,760/- ? We have heard Mr. Soumen Bhattacharyya, leaned standingcounsel appearing for the appellant/revenue and Mr. AsimChowdhury, learned Advocate assisted by Mr. Soham Sen, learnedAdvocate appearing for the respondent/assessee. As could be seen from the substantial question of lawwhich has been raised, the tax effect in the instant case iswell below the threshold limit of Rs.1 crore to enable therevenue to pursue this appeal before this Court. Therefore, the appeal (ITA/189/2009) stands disposed ofon the ground of low tax effect and the substantial question oflaw is left open. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) A/s./K.Banerjee
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan