Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I Mumbai v. M/S Acme Combines
High Court
01 Mar 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I Mumbai v. M/S Acme Combines
Date of order
01 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I Mumbai v. M/S Acme Combines, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONI.T.X.A.L. 1452/2010WITH
I.T.X.A.L. 1453/2010
Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-IMumbaiVs.M/s Acme Combines
AppellantRespondent
Mrs.Padma Divakar for the appellantMr.Jitendra Jain a/w Mr.Jas Sanghvi i/b PDS Legal
P.C.
CORAM- J.P.DEVADHAR ,AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ.DATE -1[st] March,2011
.Counsel for the revenue states that the question raised in these appeals is covered by the decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Brahma Associates in Income Tax Appeal No.1194/2010 dated 22/2/2011.
In this view of the matter, the appeals are dismissed. No costs.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue