Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I v. M/S. Binani Cement Ltd
High Court
22 Jan 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I v. M/S. Binani Cement Ltd
Date of order
22 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I v. M/S. Binani Cement Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA/98/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL-I,
-Versus-
M/S. BINANI CEMENT LTD.
BEFORE :THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANIAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAI CHATTOPADHYAYDate : 22[nd] January, 2024
Appearance:Mr. Prithu Dudheria, Adv....for the appellant.Mr. D. N. Sharma, Adv.Mr. A. K. Dey, Adv....for the respondent.
The Court : Heard learned standing counsel for theappellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.learned counsel for the respondent states that theassessment order involved in the present appeal are theassessment years 2005-06 and 2007-08. In respect of therespondent/assessee, a resolution plan was approved under theprovisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and ithas been implemented. Therefore, all liabilities stood
extinguished in view of the plan and law laid down by theHon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ghanashyam Mishra & SonsPvt. Ltd. Vs. Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd. reportedin (2021) 9 SCC 657 and subsequent decision in the case ofRuchi Soya Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of Indiareported in(2022) 6 SCC 343.In view of the statement made by learned Counsel forthe respondent/assessee, this appeal (ITA 98/2012) is dismissedwith liberty to the appellant to move a recall applicationwithin two months in the event the statements made by learnedCounsel for the respondent/assessee is found to be incorrect.
(SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.)
(RAI CHATTOPADHYAY, J.)
As.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.