Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-Iii v...

Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-Iii v. M/S. R.s. Ispat Pvt. Ltd

High Court 15 Jan 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-Iii v. M/S. R.s. Ispat Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
15 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-Iii v. M/S. R.s. Ispat Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ITA/44/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL-III -Versus- M/S. R.S. ISPAT PVT. LTD. BEFORE :THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANIAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJDate : 15[th] January, 2024 Appearance:Mr. Souman Bhattacharjee, Adv.…for the appellant. The Court : Heard learned Standing Counsel for theappellant Perusal of the impugned order dated 05.09.2011 in ITANo.113(Kol)/2011 relating to assessment year 2001-02 passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A Bench, Kolkata shows thatthe total disputed addition in income tax is Rs.32,00,000/-.Thus, the tax effect is much below the limit prescribedfor filing of appeal as prescribed in circular No. 17/2019dated 08.08.2019.According to the learned counsel for the appellant,this appeal was admitted by order dated 29.03.2012. But the appellant has not yet filed paper book although more than 11years have passed. In view of the aforesaid, this appeal is dismissedsince the tax effect is below the limit prescribed for filingappeal under the aforesaid circular. (SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.) (RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.) As.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan