Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-Iiivs.shri Manoj v. Wadhwa
High Court
15 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-Iiivs.shri Manoj v. Wadhwa
Date of order
15 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-Iiivs.shri Manoj v. Wadhwa, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 283 OF 2011
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 284 OF 2011
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 285 OF 2011
Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-IIIVs.Shri Manoj V. Wadhwa
..Appellant.
..Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta h/f Padma Divakar for the Appellant.Mr. Nitesh Joshi with Atul Jasani for the Respondent.
ALONGWITH
INCOME TAXD APPEAL NO. 1488 OF 2011WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1497 OF 2011WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 129 OF 2011
Shri Manoj V. Wadhwa.. AppellantVs.Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Cir.-37,Mumbai and another..Respondents.
Mr. Nitesh Joshi with Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Appellant.Mr. Vimal. Gupta for the Respondents.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 15TH JULY, 2011.
P.C.
1.Income Tax Appeal Nos. 1497 of 2011, 1488 of 2011 and Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 129 of 2011 are not on board. Taken on board by consent of the parties.
2.In all these matters, ITAT has set aside the order of CIT(A) and restored the matters to the file of Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of M/s Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. DCI, reported in 328 ITR 81. Since the Tribunal has restored the matters to the file of Assessing Officer, we are not inclined to entertain these appeals.
3.However, all the contentions of both the parties are kept open.
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
( J.P. DEVADHAR , J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.