Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Iv v....

Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Iv v. M/S.sas Hotels And Enterprises Ltd

High Court 14 Mar 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Iv v. M/S.sas Hotels And Enterprises Ltd
Date of order
14 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Iv v. M/S.sas Hotels And Enterprises Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.In view of the above, the Tax Case Appeal is dismissed.There shall be no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.03.2017 CORAM : The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ANDThe Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR T.C. (A) No.178 of 2017 Commissioner of Income TaxCentral IV, No.108, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai... Appellant -vs- M/s.SAS Hotels and Enterprises Ltd.,3, Mangesh Street, T.Nagar,Chennai 600 017... Respondent Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961,against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras'D' Bench, dated 18.03.2013 in ITA. No.1826/Mds/2012 for theAssessment year 2009-10 against the order of commissioner of /Income Tax(Appeals) I,Nungambakkam,Chennai-34,vide order dt.26/ made in ITA 104/2011-12 for the Assessment Year 2009-10 whichwas filed against the order of Assistant Commissioner,Income TaxDepartment Central Circle IV(2),N.No.46,T.G.Road,Chennai-34 videorder dt.15.12.11 made in PAN for the Assessment year2009-10. (Judgment of the Court was delivered by Rajiv Shakdher, J.) 1.Mr.Srinivas, learned counsel for the appellant / Revenuesays that the issue which arises for consideration in thepresent appeal is covered against the Revenue by virtue of thejudgment of a Division Bench of this Court rendered in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills and Another vs. Asst. CIT(Mad.), (2012) 340 ITR 477. 2.We are further informed that the Special Leave Petitionfiled by the Revenue has been dismissed vide order dated05.09.2016 passed in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.33475 of2012 & Others, reported in (2016) 76 taxmann.com 176 (SC). 3.In view of the above, the Tax Case Appeal is dismissed.There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS III ) /true copy/Sub Asst. RegistrarsraTo 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax Central IV, No.108, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai. 2.The Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench,chennai3.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) I,No.46,Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam,chennai-34 4.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle IV(2),Chennai-34 +1cc to Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar,Advocate sr.16178 T.C. (A) No.178 of 2017skv(co)ss(24/3/2017)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan