Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Jai...

Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Jaipur v. Shri Manish Tambi, C-33, Sikar House, Outside Chandpole Gatejaipur

High Court 30 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Jaipur v. Shri Manish Tambi, C-33, Sikar House, Outside Chandpole Gatejaipur
Date of order
30 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Jaipur v. Shri Manish Tambi, C-33, Sikar House, Outside Chandpole Gatejaipur, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In that view of the matter, the appeals stand dismissed aswithdrawn with liberty to the appellant to file rectificationapplication before the Tribunal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 110 / 2014 Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Jaipur ----Appellant Versus Shri Manish Tambi, C-33, Sikar House, Outside Chandpole GateJaipur ----Respondent Connected With D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 142 / 2014 Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus Shri Vishnu Prasad Maharwal, 60, Ratan Nagar, Dher Ke Balaji, Sikar Road, Jaipur ----Respondent D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 156 / 2014 Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus Shri Vishnu Prasad Maharwal, 60, Ratan Nagar, Dher Ke Balaji, Sikar Road, Jaipur ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anil Mehta with Mr. Sameer Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka Mr. N. L. Agarwal _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS Order 30/11/2017 Learned counsel for the appellant contended that the originalorder was passed under section 69 A and CIT(A) as well asTribunal passed the order u/s 68AA. In that view of the matter,they are desires to file rectification application before the Tribunal. In that view of the matter, the appeals stand dismissed aswithdrawn with liberty to the appellant to file rectificationapplication before the Tribunal. The time taken till date shall beconsidered while considering the rectification application. (VIJAY KUMAR VYAS)J. (K.S. JHAVERI)J. B.M.G/Gourav/132-133-134
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan