Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Lud...

Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Highway Cycles Industries Ltd., Ludhiana

High Court 04 Aug 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Highway Cycles Industries Ltd., Ludhiana
Date of order
04 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Highway Cycles Industries Ltd., Ludhiana, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ITA No.305 of 20041 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH ITA No.305 of 2004Date of Decision : 04.08.2016 Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Ludhiana Versus ...... Appellant M/s Highway Cycles Industries Ltd., Ludhiana ...... Respondent CORAM :HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.J.VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL ... Present :Mr. Zora Singh Klar, Senior Standing Counsel,for the appellant-Department. Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate, tor the respondent. ... S.J.VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since thetax effect involved is 45,37,986/-, he has instructions to withdraw thepresent appeal in view of the circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 issuedby the C.B.D.T., New Delhi. However, he prayed that liberty be granted tothe revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case somethingsurvives therein| taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legalissue aS Claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in anappropriate case.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan