Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Highway Cycles Industries Ltd., Ludhiana
High Court
04 Aug 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Highway Cycles Industries Ltd., Ludhiana
Date of order
04 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Highway Cycles Industries Ltd., Ludhiana, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA No.305 of 20041
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
ITA No.305 of 2004Date of Decision : 04.08.2016
Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Ludhiana
Versus
...... Appellant
M/s Highway Cycles Industries Ltd., Ludhiana
...... Respondent
CORAM :HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.J.VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
...
Present :Mr. Zora Singh Klar, Senior Standing Counsel,for the appellant-Department.
Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate, tor the respondent.
...
S.J.VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since thetax effect involved is 45,37,986/-, he has instructions to withdraw thepresent appeal in view of the circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 issuedby the C.B.D.T., New Delhi. However, he prayed that liberty be granted tothe revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case somethingsurvives therein|
taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legalissue aS Claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in anappropriate case.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.