Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Pat...

Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Patna v. M/S Bhargav Construction(P)Ltd., Jamshedpur

High Court 03 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · jhar_pg

Parties

Date of order

03 Jan 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Patna v. M/S Bhargav Construction(P)Ltd., Jamshedpur, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the above reason, the Tax Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI T.A.No. 36 of 2002 Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Patna ...... Appellant Versus M/s Bhargav Construction(P)Ltd., Jamshedpur ...... Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P. P. BHATT For the Appellant:M/s D.Roshan, S.C.(IT), Amit Kumar & Rupa Kumari For the Respondent:M/s Binod Poddar,Sr.Adv. M. Choudhary, D. Poddar Piyush Poddar & Amrita Sinha,Advs. Dated 3rd January, 2013 By Court – This appeal has become infructuous, in view of the fact that after the remand order passed by the C.I.T.(Appeals), having been upheld by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, fresh assessment has been made vide order dated 24[th] March, 2003. In view of the above reason, the Tax Appeal is dismissed. ( Prakash Tatia, C.J. ) ( P. P. Bhatt, J )

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.