Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S...

Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S. Padhanilam Welfare Trustvelaudham Pillai Memorial Hospitalpadanilam, Kulasekaram

High Court 21 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S. Padhanilam Welfare Trustvelaudham Pillai Memorial Hospitalpadanilam, Kulasekaram
Date of order
21 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S. Padhanilam Welfare Trustvelaudham Pillai Memorial Hospitalpadanilam, Kulasekaram, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Recording the aforesaid submission, these tax case appeals are dismissed as withdrawn leaving the question of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

T.C.A.Nos.360, 361 & 362 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.11.2024 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTHandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN T.C.A.Nos. 360, 361 & 362 of 2013 Commissioner of Income TaxChennai vs .. Appellantin all TCAs M/s. Padhanilam Welfare TrustVelaudham Pillai Memorial HospitalPadanilam, Kulasekaram. .. Respondentin all TCAs Prayer in TCA No.360 of 2013 : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, dated 19.6.2012 in ITA No.1770/Mds/2011. Prayer in TCA No.361 of 2013 : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, dated 19.6.2012 in ITA No.1771/Mds/2011. Prayer in TCA No. 362 of 2013 : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, dated 19.6.2012 in ITA No.1772/Mds/2011. For Appellant :Mrs.V.PushpaSenior Standing Counsel(in all TCAs) For Respondent:Ms.Vandana Vyasfor Mr.R.Sivaraman(in all TCAs) DR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN.,J. COMMON JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J) Mrs.V.Pushpa, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the appellant/Department would submit that the Income-Tax Department does not wish to pursue these appeals qua assessment years 2006 -07 (in TCA No. 360/13), 2007 – 08 (in TCA No.361/13) and 2008 – 09 (in TCA No.362/13) and seek withdrawal of the same on account of the low tax effect per Circular bearing No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024. 2. Recording the aforesaid submission, these tax case appeals are dismissed as withdrawn leaving the question of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter. No costs. Index:Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yesssm T.C.A.Nos. 360, 361 & 362 of 2013
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan