Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. M/S. Sical Logistics Ltd

T.C.A.Nos.894 of 2010, 695,696 & 71 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.11.2024 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHand THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN T.C.A.Nos. 894 of 2010, 695, 696 & 71 of 2013 andM.P.No.1 of 2013 T.C.A.No.894 of 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai .. Appellant vs M/s. SICAL Logistics Ltd., (Formerly M/s.South India Corporation (Agencies) Ltd),73, Armenian Street, Chennai 600 001... Respondent T.C.A.Nos.695 & 696 of 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai. .. Appellant vs M/s. Sical Logistics Limited 73, Armenian Street, Chennai – 600 001... Respondent T.C.A.NO.71 of 2013 M/s. Sical Logistics Limited, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 73-A, Armenian Street,Chennai – 600 001PAN AAACS 3789 B .. Appellant vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCompany Circle V(1),Chennai... Respondent Prayer in T.C.A.No.894 of 2006: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench, dated 27.11.09 in I.T.A.No.1280/Mds/2006. Prayer in T.C.A.No.695 of 2013: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Madras'C'Bench,dated18.10.2010in I.T.A.No.534/Mds/2009.Prayer in T.C.A.No.696 of 2013: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Madras'C'Bench,dated18.10.2010in I.T.A.No.1626/Mds/2009. Prayer in T.C.A.No.71 of 2013: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai'A'Bench,dated08.05.2012in I.T.A.No.391/Mds/2012. T.C.A.Nos.894 of 2010, 695,696 & 71 of 2013 COMMON JUDGMENT (Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J) Heard Mr.Ravikumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel, who appears for the Income Tax Department in all these matters and Mr.R.Venkata Narayanan, learned counsel for the respondent in some of the matters. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner reports no instructions. The assessee / M/s.Sical Logistics Limited has undergone Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in IA(IBC)/102(CHE)/2022 in IBA/73/2020 and has been wound up by order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai dated 08.12.2022. The operative portion of order dated 08.12.2022 is as follows:- “28. Subject to the observations made in this Order, the Resolution Plan in question is hereby APPROVED by this Adjudicating Authority. The Resolution Plan shall form part of this Order. The Resolution Plan is binding on the Corporate Debtor and other stakeholders involved so that the revival of the Debtor Company shall come into force with immediate effect. The Moratorium imposed under Section 14 shall cease to have effect from the date of this Order.” 3.Mr.Ravikumar, circulates two claims in Form B (proof of claim by operational creditors except workmen and employees both dated 30.09.2022). He is unaware whether the demand under the present tax T.C.A.Nos.894 of 2010, 695,696 & 71 of 2013 case appeals would stand subsumed in those two claims. 4.However and since neither parties can throw any more light on this aspect of the matter, these Tax Case Appeals are closed returning the substantial questions of law unanswered. The parties are at liberty to work out their claims qua the resolution plan formulated and should there be any necessity, to revive the tax case (appeal), such liberty is granted to the parties. No costs. Index:Yes/NoSpeaking orderNeutral Citation:YesvsToThe Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCompany Circle V(1),Chennai. [A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 14.11.2024 T.C.A.Nos.894 of 2010, 695,696 & 71 of 2013 DR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J.and G. ARUL MURUGAN.,J. vs T.C.A.Nos. 894 of 2010, 695, 696 & 71 of 2013 14.11.2024