Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S...

Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.saidapet Varthagar Trustno

High Court 27 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.saidapet Varthagar Trustno
Date of order
27 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.saidapet Varthagar Trustno, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of, leaving all the issues open to be canvassed before the assessing officer.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.08.2024 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN Tax Case Appeal No.342 of 2015 Commissioner of Income TaxChennai....Appellant Vs. M/s.Saidapet Varthagar TrustNo.46, Bazaaar Road, SaidapetChennai 600 015. ...Respondent ----- Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 31.01.2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench in ITA.371/Mds/2012. For Appellant : Mrs.V.Pushpa Senior Standing CounselFor Respondent : Mr.G.Ashoka Pathy for M/s.Pass Associates ---- J U D G M E N T (Delivered by C. SARAVANAN, J.) In similar circumstances, the assessee's appeals were dismissed today in TCA Nos.265 of 2015 and 552 of 2015. In this appeal, the Income Tax Department is on appeal against the order of the Tribunal passing a contra decision. T.C.A.No.342 of 2015 R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC.SARAVANAN, J. KST 2. Since similar issues have been remitted back to the Asssessing Officer based on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) -vs- Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority [2022] 143 taxmann.com 278 (SC) , to pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, this appeal is disposed of following the aforesaid decision. 3. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of, leaving all the issues open to be canvassed before the assessing officer. No costs. NCS : Yes/NoIndex : Yes/NoKST (R.S.K.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.)27.08.2024 To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'D' Bench. T.C.A.No.342 of 2015 T.C.A.No.342of 2015 R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC.SARAVANAN, J. (Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) This matter is posted today under the caption 'For Being Mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel for the appellant Revenue. 2. In the opening line of the order dated 27.08.2024, instead of the words "the assessee's appeal", the words "the similar appeals" are to be employed. Likewise, in the second paragraph, in the first line, instead of the words "assessing officer", the words "Director of Income Tax (Exemptions)" be employed. 3. Accordingly, the corrected order copy be issued by the Registry to the parties. (R.S.K.,J.) (C.S.N,J.)01.10.2024 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.No.342 of 2015 R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC.SARAVANAN, J.KST T.C.A.No.342 of 2015 01.10.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan