Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S...

Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.south India House Estates & Properties Ltd.south India Houseno

High Court 05 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.south India House Estates & Properties Ltd.south India Houseno
Date of order
05 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.south India House Estates & Properties Ltd.south India Houseno, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Recording the same, the present appeal stands dismissed as Low Tax Effect.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.11.2024 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMARAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN T.C.A.No.1195 of 2015 Commissioner of Income TaxChennai...Appellant Vs. M/s.South India House Estates & Properties Ltd.South India HouseNo.73, Armenian StreetChennai – 600 001...Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras "A" Bench, dated 11.03.2015 in I.T.A.No.53/Mds/2013. For the Appellant:Mr.J.NarayanasamySenior Standing Counsel For the Respondent:Mr.A.S.Sriraman JUDGMENT (Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) The substantial questions of law raised in the present tax case appeal are:- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis (i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in holding that the initiation of the reassessment for the assessment year 2004-05 is bad in law and consequently setting aside the reassessment proceedings? (ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the tribunal was right in holding that the initiation of the reassessment for the assessment year 2005-06 is bad in law and consequently setting aside the reassessment proceedings? (iii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that interest derived from lending monies to sister concern is to be treated as income from business and not as income from other sources for the assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06? 2. It is submitted by Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant Revenue that the present Tax Case Appeal is covered under the Low Tax Effect as per the recent Circular dated 17.09.2024, in Circular No.9/2024. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.No.1195 of 2015 3. Recording the same, the present appeal stands dismissed as Low Tax Effect. The questions of law raised in this appeal are kept open to be decided at the later point of time. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.S.K., J.) (C.S.N, J) 05.11.2024 Neutral Citation:Yes/No drm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.No.1195 of 2015 R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC. SARAVANAN, J.(drm) T.C.A.No.1195 of 2015 05.11.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan