Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.tcp Limited10, Tcp Sapthagiri Bhavankarpagamba Nagarmylapore, Chennai 600 004
High Court
11 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.tcp Limited10, Tcp Sapthagiri Bhavankarpagamba Nagarmylapore, Chennai 600 004
Date of order
11 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. M/S.tcp Limited10, Tcp Sapthagiri Bhavankarpagamba Nagarmylapore, Chennai 600 004, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the appellant Revenue, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed for low tax effect, keeping open the substantial questions of law for adjudication at appropriate stage.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.11.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Tax Case Appeal No.360 of 2022
Commissioner of Income TaxChennai.
....Appellant
Vs.
M/s.TCP Limited10, TCP Sapthagiri BhavanKarpagamba NagarMylapore, Chennai 600 004.
....Respondent
-----
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench Chennai, dated 09.08.2021 made in I.T.A.No.3358/2019.
For Appellant : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : No appearance
-----
J U D G M E N T
(Delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai by raising the following substantial question of law:
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.360 of 2022
" Whether the Tribunal was justified in upholding the order of the ITAT for the assessment year 2005-2006 by allowing the interest on borrowed capital which was paid to an Associate Company of the Respondent?"
2. It is brought to our notice by the learned Standing Counsel for the
appellant Revenue that in the instant case, as per the CBDT's Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024 the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal can be disposed of, keeping the substantial questions of law raised in this appeal open for adjudication at a later point of time.
3. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the appellant Revenue, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed for low tax effect, keeping open the substantial questions of law for adjudication at appropriate stage. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
NCS : Yes/NoKST
(R.S.K.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.) 11.11.2024
To
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal'A' Bench, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC.SARAVANAN, J.
KST
T.C.A.No.360 of 2022
11.11.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.