Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. M.v.seetharam Sah
High Court
25 Jan 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. M.v.seetharam Sah
Date of order
25 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. M.v.seetharam Sah, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the instant case, the tax effect is less than the monetary limit imposed and the appeal is, hence, dismissed as not pressed, preserving the substantial question of law for determination in an appropriate case.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
25.01.2017
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice HULUVADI G.RAMESHANDThe Hon'ble Dr. Justice ANITA SUMANTH
T.C.A. No.571 of 2008
Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai.
.. Appellant
Versus
M.V.Seetharam Sah.. Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the Order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'C' Bench, dated 27.09.2007 in ITA. No.2318/Mds/2005.
For Appellant .. Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondent .. Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar-----
JUDGMENT
The Tax Case Appeal filed by the Revenue calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench, dated 27.09.2007 in ITA. No.2318/Mds/2005, has been admitted on 03.07.2008 for consideration of the following substantial questions of law:
HULUVADI G.RAMESH, JANDDr.ANITA SUMANTH,J
vga
“1.Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the protective assessment made in the hand of the assessee is valid in law, when the assessee himself has filed his return of income including his share of short terms capital gains therein?2.Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, protective assessment has been made in the hands of the assessee it is valid in law when the same has been made in view of the fact that a second appeal of the firm M/s.Sapthagiri Finance and Investments, Kancheepuram, was pending and the demand was also kept in abeyance pending outcome of the second appeal of the firm?
2. Circular instruction issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 stipulates that appeals shall not be filed/ pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.20 lakhs. In the instant case, the tax effect is less than the monetary limit imposed and the appeal is, hence, dismissed as not pressed, preserving the substantial question of law for determination in an appropriate case. No costs.
(H.G.R.,J) (A.S.M.,J)
25.01.2017
vga
T.C.A.No.571 of 2008
http://www.judis.nic.in
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.