Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. Sh...

Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. Shri N.f.dadabhoy

High Court 10 Aug 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. Shri N.f.dadabhoy
Date of order
10 Aug 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. Shri N.f.dadabhoy, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.8.2015 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIANANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN Tax Case Appeal Nos.422 and 444 of 2015 Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai. ...Appellant in both appeals Vs Shri N.F.Dadabhoy ...Respondent in TCA.422/15F.L.Dadabhoy ...Respondent in TCA.444/15 APPEALS under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against theorders dated 12.12.2014 respectively in I.T.A.Nos.1186/Mds/2014 and1187/Mds/ 2014 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "A"Bench, Chennai. Against the Order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)VI,Chennai-34, dated 31.01.2014 made in ITA.Nos.1236/13-14/A-VI and1234/13-14 and against the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Circle IV(3), Chennai dated 31.10.11, made in PANNos.AAAPD4349P & AAAPD4332J respectively for the Assessment Year2005-06. For Appellant in both the appeals : Mr.J.Narayanasamy COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment was delivered by V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J) The Revenue has come up with the above appeals as against theorders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that thepurchase and sale of shares by the assessee could not be treated asbusiness income. 2. Heard Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned Standing Counsel for theDepartment. 3. The very same question of law that is raised in these appealsagainst the very same assessee in respect of the assessment year2006-2007 was dismissed by this Court on 29.10.2014 in T.C.A.No.810of 2014. 4. Therefore, following the same, these appeals are alsodismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarTo1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A Bench, Chennai.2.The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)VI, Chennai - 34.3.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle IV(3), Chennai.+2cc's to Mr.J.Narayanasamy, Advocate, S.R.No.41282 & 41283TCA.Nos.422 & 444 of 2015CA(CO)CA(04/09/2015)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan