Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Shri R.b.choudaryno.1, Dr.radhakrishnan Salai,Mylapore,Chennai β 600 004
High Court
27 Aug 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Shri R.b.choudaryno.1, Dr.radhakrishnan Salai,Mylapore,Chennai β 600 004
Date of order
27 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
β
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Shri R.b.choudaryno.1, Dr.radhakrishnan Salai,Mylapore,Chennai β 600 004, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The tax case appeal is thus, dismissed, as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below β read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order β as passed by the High Court
T.C.No.587 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.08.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTHandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
T.C.No.587 of 2008
Commissioner of Income TaxChennai.
.. Appellant
vs
Shri R.B.ChoudaryNo.1, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai,Mylapore,Chennai β 600 004.
.. Respondent
Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, dated 31.08.2007 in IT(SS) A No.105/Mds/2005 for the assessment year 1.4.96 to 27.6.2002.
For Appellant:Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel
For Respondent:Mr.K.Raviand Mr.Varun Ranganathan T.N.
DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN.,J
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income-Tax Department states that the present tax case appeal is not pursued in light of the litigation policy as set out under Circular bearing No. 1 of 2019 dated 05.08.2019.
2. The tax case appeal is thus, dismissed, as withdrawn. No costs.
Index:Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yesssm
[A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 27.08.2024
T.C.No.587 of 2008
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CAβclient relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.