Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Shr...

Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Shri Yogesh B Sanghvi16, Lakshman Street,T.nagar, Chennai – 600 017

High Court 21 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Shri Yogesh B Sanghvi16, Lakshman Street,T.nagar, Chennai – 600 017
Date of order
21 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. Shri Yogesh B Sanghvi16, Lakshman Street,T.nagar, Chennai – 600 017, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present tax case appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.1.2016 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Tax Case Appeal No.380 of 2014 Commissioner of Income TaxChennai .. Appellant Versus Shri Yogesh B Sanghvi16, Lakshman Street,T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017,PAN: .. Respondent Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `C' Bench, dated 21.10.2013 in I.T.A.No.1919/Mds/2008. For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Mr.J.Narayanaswamy and Mr.M.SwaminathanFor Respondent : Mr.V.S.Jayakumar JUDGMENT The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue had submitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdraw the present tax case appeal, in view of the Circular No.21 of 2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated 10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is less than Rs.20,00,000/-. 2. The learned counsels had further submitted that liberty may be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular. 3. In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present tax case appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clear that the questions of law, which may arise for the decision of this Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to be considered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance with law. It is also made clear that it would be open to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular, within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs. (M.J.J.,) (S.V.J.,)Index:Yes/No 21-1-2016Internet:Yes/Nousk Note: Issue order copy on 28.1.2016. To:The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `C' Bench. M.JAICHANDREN,J.ANDS.VIMALA,J. usk Tax Case Appeal No.380 of 2014
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan