Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. Shri.s.asokan
High Court
10 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. Shri.s.asokan
Date of order
10 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai v. Shri.s.asokan, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10-02-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
TCA NO. 1157 of 2010
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai.
Vs
Shri.S.Asokan,
1/34, Pilliyar Koil St., Ayyappanthangal, Ch-56.
Appellant(s)
For Appellant(s):
M/s.T.Ravikumar For AppellantM/s.G.Baskar
For Respondent(s):
Respondent(s)
S.S.SUNDAR, J.
andC.SARAVANAN, J.
ORDER
This appeal is directed against the formal order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated
15.03.2005 in ITA No. 742/Mds /02. In this appeal the appellant has raised the following
substantial question of law to be answered;
“1.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in allowing the claim of deduction under Section 80IB(10) when no completion certificate is issued to the assessee by the Local Authority?
2.Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that assessee has complied with the requirements of Section 80IB(10)?
2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the amount involved in the
present appeal is below the monetary limit as per the circulars issued by the Government of
India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes in Circular No. 5/2024 and 09/2024 dated 15.03.2024 and 17.09.2024 respectively.
3. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the
appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the Substantial Question of Law is left open to be answered at an appropriate appeal. No costs.
(S.S.SUNDAR
10-02-2025
J.)
(C.SARAVANANJ.)
Index : Yes kas
S.S.SUNDAR,J.)
and
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.SARAVANAN, J. kas
TCA No.1157 of 2010
10-02-2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.