Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. V.r.venkatachalam
High Court
25 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. V.r.venkatachalam
Date of order
25 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Taxchennai v. V.r.venkatachalam, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present tax case appeals stand dismissed, as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 25.1.2016
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice M.JAICHANDRENandThe Honourable Mrs.Justice S.VIMALA
Tax Case (Appeal) Nos.819 and 820 of 2007
Commissioner of Income TaxChennai
-vs-
...Appellant in both the appeals
V.R.Venkatachalam
...Respondent in both the appeals
TCA No.819 of 2007:
Tax Case (Appeal) has been filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras B Bench, dated 14.6.2005 in ITA No.1048/Mds/99.
TCA No.820 of 2007:
Tax Case (Appeal) has been filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras B Bench, dated 14.6.2005 in ITA No.1049/Mds/99.
For appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar
Mr.J.NarayanaswamyMr.T.R.Senthil KumarMr.M.Swaminathan
For respondent : Mr.V.D.Gopal
J U D G M E N T
(The Judgment of the Court was made byM.JAICHANDREN,J.)
The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue had submitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdraw the present tax case appeals, in view of the Circular No.21 of 2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated 10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is less than Rs.20,00,000/-.
2. The learned counsels had further submitted that liberty may
be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeals, if it is found that they had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though they fall under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.
3. In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present tax case appeals stand dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clear that the questions of law, which may arise for the decision of this Court, in the present tax case appeals, are left open to be considered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance with law. It is also made clear that it would be open to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeals, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though they fall under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular, within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs.
(M.J.,J) (S.V.,J) 25.1.2016
lan
INDEX : YESINTERNET : YES
4
M.JAICHANDREN, J.and S.VIMALA, J.
lan
To:
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras B Bench
Tax Case (Appeal) Nos.819 and 820 of 2007
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.