Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle – 1, Na...

Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle – 1, Namakkalsalem v. P.madheswaran

High Court 15 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle – 1, Namakkalsalem v. P.madheswaran
Date of order
15 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle – 1, Namakkalsalem v. P.madheswaran, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in allowing the carry forward of depreciation loss that has not been disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income nor certified by the Chartered Accountant in Form 3CD?" 2.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.10.2024 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMARANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN T.C.A.No.46 of 2023 Commissioner of Income TaxCircle – 1, NamakkalSalem...Appellant Vs. P.Madheswaran..Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench,Chennaidated26.08.2022passedin I.T.A.No.3365/CHNY/2019. For the Appellant:Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel For the Respondent: Mr.G.Baskar JUDGMENT (Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)The present tax case appeal was admitted on 06.02.2023 by this Court on the following substantial question of law:- "1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in allowing the carry forward of depreciation loss that has not been disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income nor certified by the Chartered Accountant in Form 3CD?" 2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant Revenue that this matter is covered under the Low Tax Effect as per the recent Circular dated 17.09.2024, in Circular No.9/2024. 3. Hence, this appeal stands dismissed, as covered under the low tax effect and the substantial question of law arising in this appeal is kept open to be decided at the later point of time. There shall be no order as to costs. Neutral Citation:Yes/No drm T.C.A.No.46 of 2023 R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC. SARAVANAN, J. (drm) T.C.A.No.46 of 2023 15.10.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan