Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Vi, Mumbai v. Hindalco Industries Ltd
High Court
11 Jun 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Vi, Mumbai v. Hindalco Industries Ltd
Date of order
11 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Vi, Mumbai v. Hindalco Industries Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the withdrawal of the appeal, the above notice of motion also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.345/2004
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No.1064 of 2004.
Commissioner of Income Tax,City-VI, Mumbai.
..Appellant.
Vs.
Hindalco Industries Ltd
..Respondent.
Mr B. M. Chatterjee with Ms P. P. Bhosalefor the Applicant.
Mr P. R. Toprani for the Respondent.
CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNANAND V.C. DAGA,JJ.DATED:25TH JUNE, 2007.
P.C.:-
1.
As the tax liability involved in the
allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
2.Permissible court fees be refunded to
the appellant.
3.
In view of the withdrawal of the appeal,
the above notice of motion also stands
dismissed.
(V.C. DAGA,J.)
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue