Commissioner Of Income Taxcoimbatore v. M/S.lasik Centre (India) P Ltd
High Court
29 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxcoimbatore v. M/S.lasik Centre (India) P Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Taxcoimbatore v. M/S.lasik Centre (India) P Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Commissioner of Income TaxCoimbatore.. Appellant
Versus
M/s.Lasik Centre (India) P Ltd.,No.582-a, D.B. RoadR.S.PuramCoimbatore – 641 004 .. Respondent
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260 A of Income Tax Act,1961 has been filed against the order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal Madras `A' Bench, Chennai, dated 30.4.2012 inITA No.1480/Mds/2011 as against the order dated 29/6/11 and madein Appeal No.133/10-11 on the file of The Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals)-I, Coimbatore and as against the order dated01/12/10 made in P.A.No./GIR No.AAACC3765C on the file of DeputyCommissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle-I(3), Coimbatore.
The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue hadsubmitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdrawthe present tax case appeal, in view of the Circular No.21 of2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department ofRevenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is lessthan Rs.20,00,000/-.
2. The learned counsels had further submitted that libertymay be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax caseappeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn,
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptionsmentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.
3. In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clearthat the questions of law, which may arise for the decision ofthis Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to beconsidered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance withlaw. It is also made clear that it would be open to theAppellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is foundthat it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it fallsunder the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular,within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `A' Bench, Chennai,
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Coimbatore.
3.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I,Coimbatore.
4.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Circle-I(3), Coimbatore.
+1cc to M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar , Advocate, S.R.No.6301+1cc to M/S.T.R.SenthilKumar, Advocate, S.R.No.6413
Tax Case Appeal No.38 of 2013
vd(CO)srg(11/02/2016)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.