Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle β 1, Coimbatore v. Super Sales India Limited34-A, Kamraj Roadcoimbatore 641 018Pan: Aadcs 0650 A
High Court
15 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle β 1, Coimbatore v. Super Sales India Limited34-A, Kamraj Roadcoimbatore 641 018Pan: Aadcs 0650 A
Date of order
15 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
β
Outcome
Dismissed
The order β as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Taxcorporate Circle β 1, Coimbatore v. Super Sales India Limited34-A, Kamraj Roadcoimbatore 641 018Pan: Aadcs 0650 A, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in allowing depreciation amounting to Rs.2,19,94,875/- on account of foreign exchange fluctuation loss relating to foreign currency term loan availed for purchase of windmill and the same was capitalized by the assessee its books...
Summary auto-generated from the order below β read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.10.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMARAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
T.C.A.No.18 of 2023
Commissioner of Income TaxCorporate Circle β 1, Coimbatore...Appellant
Vs.
Super Sales India Limited34-A, Kamraj RoadCoimbatore 641 018PAN: AADCS 0650 A..Respondent
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal βDβ Bench,Chennaidated27.09.2022passedin I.T.A.No.2093/CHNY/2017.
For the Appellant : Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel
For the Respondent :Mr.R.Venkatanarayananfor M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar Padmanabhan
JUDGMENT
(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)The present tax case appeal was admitted on 11.01.2023 by
this Court on the following substantial questions of law:-
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
"1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in allowing depreciation amounting to Rs.2,19,94,875/- on account of foreign exchange fluctuation loss relating to foreign currency term loan availed for purchase of windmill and the same was capitalized by the assessee its books of accounts?
2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was justified in allowing the appeal of the assessee without appreciating the fact that capital expenditure incurred by the assessee for purchase of windmill cannot be treated as expenditure u/s. 36 or 37 of the Income Tax Act?"
2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant Revenue that this matter is covered under the Low Tax Effect as per the recent Circular dated 17.09.2024, in Circular No.9/2024.
T.C.A.No.18 of 2023
3. Hence, this appeal stands dismissed, as covered under the
low tax effect and the substantial questions of law arising in this appeal are kept open to be decided at the later point of time. There shall be no order as to costs.
(R.S.K., J.) (C.S.N, J) 15.10.2024
Neutral Citation:Yes/No
drm
T.C.A.No.18 of 2023
R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC. SARAVANAN, J.
(drm)
T.C.A.No.18 of 2023
15.10.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CAβclient relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.