Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Cir...

Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle 2,Coimbatore v. M/S. Rajshree Sugars & Chemicals Ltd.,"The Uffizi"

High Court 21 Nov 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle 2,Coimbatore v. M/S. Rajshree Sugars & Chemicals Ltd.,"The Uffizi"
Date of order
21 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Corporate Circle 2,Coimbatore v. M/S. Rajshree Sugars & Chemicals Ltd.,"The Uffizi", the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the tax case appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.11.2022 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN T.C.A. No.321 of 2022 Commissioner of Income Tax,Corporate Circle 2,Coimbatore...Appellant Vs. M/s. Rajshree Sugars & Chemicals Ltd.,"The Uffizi", No. 338, Avinashhi Road,Peelamedu, Coimbatore 641 004.PAN: AABCR 4179D ..Respondent Prayer:Tax Case Appeal as against the order dated 25.02.2022 passed in ITA No. 873/Chny/2017 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai. 1\4 For Appellant For Respondent ::Mr.M. Swaminathan::Mr.R. Venkatnarayanan J U D G M EN T S. VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND C. SARAVANAN,J. In this appeal, the appellant has raised substantial questions of law. It is noticed that the substantial questions of law that have been raised by the appellant have been answered by this Court in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai V. Lanco Tanjore Power Co. Ltd reported in [2021] 434 ITR 671 (Madras) in favour of the assessee. 2.Though the Income Tax Department has preferred an appeal in SLP Appeal (C) No. 16544 of 2021, we are not inclined to admit this appeal as the issue, as of now, stands covered in favour of the respondent. Hence, the tax case appeal stands dismissed. In case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court 2\4 T.C.A. No. 321 of 2022 reverses the order of this Court, then it is open to the Department to re-open the issue in the above case. No costs. nv (S.V.N.J.) (C.S.N.J.) 21.11.2022 3\4 4\4 T.C.A. No. 321 of 2022 S. VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND C. SARAVANAN,J.nv T.C.A. No. 321 of 2022 21.11.2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan