Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Taxfaridabad v. T...

Commissioner Of Income Taxfaridabad v. The Senior Post Master,Faridabad

High Court 21 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxfaridabad v. The Senior Post Master,Faridabad
Date of order
21 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
2002-2003
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Taxfaridabad v. The Senior Post Master,Faridabad, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Issue: The appeal was admitted by this Court for determination of thefollowing substantial question of law: “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,the ITAT is right in upholding the order of Ld.

Decision: 120 of 2006 by aseparate detailed order of even date, this appeal has been renderedinfructuous and is disposed of as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. --- Income Tax Appeal No. 192 of 2008Date of decision: 21.3.2011 Commissioner of Income TaxFaridabad --- Appellant Versus The Senior Post Master,Faridabad --- Respondent CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL --- Present:Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Senior Standing Counselfor the appellant-Revenue. --- AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961(for short “the Act”) has been filed by the Revenue against the order dated16.11.2006, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi Bench ‘I’,New Delhi (in short “the Tribunal”) in ITA No. 933/DEL/2005, relating tothe assessment year 2002-2003. The appeal was admitted by this Court for determination of thefollowing substantial question of law: “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,the ITAT is right in upholding the order of Ld. CIT(A) inallowing the appeal of the assessee and holding the appeal of the Revenue as infructuous whereas the application of theassessee under Section 154 was beyond the scope of thatsection.” In view of dismissal of Income Tax Appeal No. 120 of 2006 by aseparate detailed order of even date, this appeal has been renderedinfructuous and is disposed of as such. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE March 21, 2011*rkmalik* (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan