Commissioner Of Income Tax(International Taxation)-2 v. Ls Cable & Systems Ltd., Korea(Formerly, Ls Cable Limited
High Court
05 Sep 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax(International Taxation)-2 v. Ls Cable & Systems Ltd., Korea(Formerly, Ls Cable Limited
Date of order
05 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax(International Taxation)-2 v. Ls Cable & Systems Ltd., Korea(Formerly, Ls Cable Limited, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: SINGH O R D E R05.09.2017 % In view of the order dated 26[th]July, 2017 passed by this Court in W.P.(C)No.6296/2017 {Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2v.LS Cable & Systems Ltd., Korea (Formerly LS Cable Limited)}, thepresent writ petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~45
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 7837/2017
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2..... PetitionerThrough:Mr.RahulChaudhary,SeniorStanding Counsel with Mr. SanjayKumar, Junior Standing Counsel.
versus
LS CABLE & SYSTEMS LTD., KOREA(FORMERLY, LS CABLE LIMITED)
..... Respondent
Through:Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Senior StandingCounsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai,Advocate.
CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHARJUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R05.09.2017
%
In view of the order dated 26[th]July, 2017 passed by this Court in W.P.(C)No.6296/2017 {Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2v.LS Cable & Systems Ltd., Korea (Formerly LS Cable Limited)}, thepresent writ petition is dismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SEPTEMBER 05, 2017dk
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.