Commissioner Of Income Taxinternational Taxationchennai-600 034 v. Appellant(S
High Court
23 Jul 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxinternational Taxationchennai-600 034 v. Appellant(S
Date of order
23 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Taxinternational Taxationchennai-600 034 v. Appellant(S, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
C.M.P.No.9725 of 2025 inT.C.A.No.SR 20931 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.07.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
C.M.P.No.9725 of 2025
in
T.C.A.No.SR 20931 of 2025
Commissioner Of Income TaxInternational TaxationChennai-600 034
Vs
Appellant(s)
M/s. Watanmal Boolchand Company LtdC/o. CRBS & Associates LLPChartered AccountantsNo.37, 2nd Street, Alagiri NagarVadapalani, Chennai-600 026
Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s):
Mr.R.Karthik
For Respondent(s):
M/s.A.Sharren
___________
Page 1 of 2
C.M.P.No.9725 of 2025 inT.C.A.No.SR 20931 of 2025
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This is an application seeking to condone the delay in re-presentation of the appeal.
3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, the application for condonation of delay is allowed.
4. Appeal be listed for admission.
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J)
23.07.2025
kpl
___________
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue