Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Taxinternational...

Commissioner Of Income Taxinternational Taxation,Chennai 600 034 v. M/S.watanmal Boolchand Company Ltd.,Co/Crbs & Associates Llp, Chartered Accountants

High Court 31 Jul 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxinternational Taxation,Chennai 600 034 v. M/S.watanmal Boolchand Company Ltd.,Co/Crbs & Associates Llp, Chartered Accountants
Date of order
31 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Taxinternational Taxation,Chennai 600 034 v. M/S.watanmal Boolchand Company Ltd.,Co/Crbs & Associates Llp, Chartered Accountants, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

TCA No.138 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 31.07.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN TCA No.138 of 2025and CMP No.18344 of 2025 Commissioner of Income TaxInternational Taxation,Chennai 600 034. .. Appellant -vs- M/s.Watanmal Boolchand Company Ltd.,Co/CRBS & Associates LLP, Chartered Accountants,No.37, 2nd Street, Alagiri Nagar, Vadapalani,Chennai 600 026. PAN : .. Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 22.12.2023 made in IT(TP)A No.29/CHNY/2022 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” Bench, Chennai for the Assessment Year 2007-08. For Appellant:Mr.R.Karthik For Respondent : Mr.T.Banusekar * * * * * Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) TCA No.138 of 2025 Though the learned counsel for the Appellant/Revenue raised an issue considering framing of substantial question of law, he fairly admits that the issue raised in this case and the questions of law as proposed by him have already been answered against the Revenue and in favour of Assessee vide judgment dated 10.06.2025 in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax, International Taxation vs. Sutherland Global Services Inc., [(2025) 175 taxmann.com 897 (Madras)]. In that view of the matter, the appeal does not have any substantial question of law to be decided and therefore, dismissed at the admission stage itself. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim application stands closed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 31.07.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Nosra Page 2 of 4 To 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai. 'D' Bench, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax International Taxation, Chennai 600 034. International Taxation, Chennai 600 034. Page 3 of 4 TCA No.138 of 2025 Page 4 of 4 TCA No.138 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND SUNDER MOHAN, J. (sra) TCA No.138 of 2025 31.07.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan