Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iii,...

Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iii, Kolkata v. Goldman Securities Limited

High Court 01 Dec 2023 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · calcutta_original_side

Parties

Date of order

01 Dec 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iii, Kolkata v. Goldman Securities Limited, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Since no paper book has been filed by theappellant/Income Tax Department we dismiss the appeal (ITA/103/2010) for non-compliance of the order.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

OD-4 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOLKATA-III, KOLKATA -Versus- GOLDMAN SECURITIES LIMITED BEFORE :THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANIAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJDate : 1[st] December, 2023 The Court : Case called out. None appears for the appellant to press the appeal.By order dated 10[th] June, 2010 this Court directed the appellant to file requisite number of paper books within threemonths. From the records of this appeal it appears that paperbook has not yet been filed. This appeal is pending in thisCourt for last thirteen years. Since no paper book has been filed by theappellant/Income Tax Department we dismiss the appeal (ITA/103/2010) for non-compliance of the order. (RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)As.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.