Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iii, Kolkata v. M/S. Lily Biscuit Co. Pvt. Ltd
High Court
06 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iii, Kolkata v. M/S. Lily Biscuit Co. Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
06 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iii, Kolkata v. M/S. Lily Biscuit Co. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the result, the appeal stands rejected and the substantial question of law suggested by the revenue is left open.Consequently, the connected application for stay (IANo.GA/2/2011) also stands closed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITAT/92/2011IA No.GA/1/2011 (Old No.GA/1047/2011)IA No.GA/2/2011 (Old No.GA/1048/2011)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOLKATA-III, KOLKATA
-Versus-
M/S. LILY BISCUIT CO. PVT. LTD.
Appearance:Mr. Prithu Dudheria, Adv....for the appellant.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
-And-
The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Date : 6[th] June, 2022.
The Court : We have heard Mr. Prithu Dudheria, learnedstanding counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue.
There is a delay of 3043 days in filing the appeal. We
have perused the affidavit filed in support of the condonation ofdelay petition and we find that the same is devoid of any reasons,particularly when there is an inordinate delay of 3043 days infiling the appeal.Thus, in the absence of any explanation for the hugedelay, we are not inclined to exercise any discretion in the
matter. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay (IANo.GA/1/2011) is dismissed.
In the result, the appeal stands rejected and the
substantial question of law suggested by the revenue is left open.Consequently, the connected application for stay (IANo.GA/2/2011) also stands closed.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
As/S.Das
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.