Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iv v. M/S. Simplex Projuects Ltd
High Court
13 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iv v. M/S. Simplex Projuects Ltd
Date of order
13 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iv v. M/S. Simplex Projuects Ltd, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For such reasons, the appeal stands dismissed.Consequently, the question of law suggested, is left open.With the dismissal of the appeal, the connectedapplication for stay (IA No.GA/2/2014) also stands closed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITAT/87/2014
IA No.GA/2/2014 (Old No.GA/1939/2014)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOLKATA-IV,
-Versus-
M/S. SIMPLEX PROJUECTS LTD.
Appearance:Mr. Soumen Bhattacharyya, Adv....for the appellant.
Ms. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, Adv....for the respondent.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM -And- The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 13[th] June, 2022.
The Court : We have heard Mr. Soumen Bhattacharyya,learned standing counsel for the appellant and Ms. NilanjanaBanerjee Pal, learned Advocate for the respondent/assessee.The learned Advocate appearing for the respondentsubmitted that a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency andBankruptcy Code, 2016 has been filed by the State Bank of India,the financial creditor against the respondent/assessee inIVN.P/2(KB)2022 and order has been passed on 27[th] April, 2022 bythe National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench admitting theapplication and ordering that there shall be a moratorium under
Section 14 of the Code. Further, in terms of Section 238 of theCode, the provisions of this Code will have an overriding effectover the orders passed by the tribunal.
In such circumstances, the revenue cannot pursue thisappeal. For such reasons, the appeal stands dismissed.Consequently, the question of law suggested, is left open.With the dismissal of the appeal, the connectedapplication for stay (IA No.GA/2/2014) also stands closed.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
S.Das/As.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.