Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iv v....

Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iv v. M/S. The Diamond Co. Ltd

High Court 01 Dec 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iv v. M/S. The Diamond Co. Ltd
Date of order
01 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kolkata-Iv v. M/S. The Diamond Co. Ltd, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA/110/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOLKATA-IV -Versus- M/S. THE DIAMOND CO. LTD. BEFORE :THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANIAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJDate : 1[st] December, 2023 Appearance:Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv....for the appellant.Ms. D. Mukherji, Adv....for the respondent. The Court : Heard learned counsel for the appellantand learned counsel for the respondent. Both the learned counsel for the parties jointly pointout that the Income Tax Department had filed appeal before theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ Bench, Kolkata confining theappeal to the following ground:“On the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, Ld. CIT(A) erred in treating the business incomeof Rs.2,53,03,344/- as capital gain violating thedecision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of G.Venkataswami Naidu & Co. –vs.- CIT [35 ITR 594 (SC)]”. In view of the aforesaid facts, learned counsel forthe parties pointed out that the tax effect would be less thanthe limit prescribed vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8[th] August,2019 fixing the limit for filing of appeal by the Department.From the perusal of the report we also find that paper book hasnot yet been filed by the appellant despite a clear directiongiven by this Court by order dated 23[rd] December, 2015.In view of the aforesaid, the appeal (ITA/110/2010) isdismissed being below the monetary limit fixed under theaforesaid circular. (SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.) (RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.) As.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan