Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Taxltu-Chennai v....

Commissioner Of Income Taxltu-Chennai v. M/S Simpson And Company Limited861/862, Anna Salai Chennai

High Court 12 Jun 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Taxltu-Chennai v. M/S Simpson And Company Limited861/862, Anna Salai Chennai
Date of order
12 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Taxltu-Chennai v. M/S Simpson And Company Limited861/862, Anna Salai Chennai, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.06.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN TCA No.449 of 2012 Commissioner of Income TaxLTU-Chennai Appellant Vs M/s Simpson and Company Limited861/862, Anna Salai Chennai Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Chennai, dated 17.07.2012 in ITA No.11/Mds/2011. For Appellant:Mr.T.RavikumarFor Respondent:Mr.R.Vijayaraghavanfor M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar __________Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Shri Ravikumar states that the monetary limit involved in this appeal is below the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India. Counsel says that he has instructions, therefore, to withdraw the appeal. 2. Counsel also states that the withdrawal is only due to the monetary limit and without conceding the stand of the Department. Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 12.06.2025 Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nobbr __________Page 2 of 4 To: 1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Chennai. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax Large Taxpayer Unit Chennai Large Taxpayer Unit Chennai 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Large Taxpayer Unit, Chennai Large Taxpayer Unit, Chennai __________ Page 3 of 4 __________ Page 4 of 4 TCA No.449 of 2012 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDSUNDER MOHAN,J. bbr TCA No.449 of 2012 12.06.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan